The Age of Confident Incomprehension

It remains one of civilisation's stranger habits that men who struggle to describe a municipal drainage project will nevertheless speak with theatrical certainty about war. Give them a microphone, a flag, and a row of attentive officials, and hesitation liquefies into prophecy. Entire regions are redrawn verbally by men who have rarely demonstrated mastery over a sentence that survives first contact with daylight.

The modern podium rewards conviction more than comprehension. Fluency substitutes for insight; firmness of tone is mistaken for firmness of mind. We live in an age where certainty requires no apprenticeship. A camera lens, a slogan, and a sense of grievance are sufficient credentials for expertise on the fate of nations.

On the Range, the dialogue often feels syndicated. American media catchphrases arrive intact, “woke,” “immigration,” “Western civilisation”, seasoned with local conviction. There’s the usual distaste for Trump’s style, though an audible respect for his readiness to strike hard at whatever version of the menace of the month is being discussed. Certainty needs only a signal, not a passport.

It is curious how distant complexity can seem more approachable than the variety at home. In a country still uncomfortable discussing how its land changed hands, we are remarkably fluent when diagnosing the failures of other civilisations. Persia, it seems, can be explained over a barbecue more readily than Australia.

Perhaps this is the real civic religion of our time: confident incomprehension. The ability to stand before a map, a microphone, or a barbecue and reshape the world by force of tone. We are fluent in the vocabulary of freedom yet uneasy with its complications. A civilisation that treats its first inhabitants as a parenthesis finds it simple to assume that other cultures, too, are awaiting correction.

One may fear regimes, distrust ideologies, or decry fanaticism, all sensible postures, yet the habit of speaking first and learning later disfigures even intelligent commentary. The impulse to simplify remains irresistible. Certainty is faster, lighter, and more publicly rewarded than understanding.

History, for its part, remains less cooperative. It continues to resist our rearrangements, indifferent to the persuasive cadence of our opinions. Still, the microphones await, and the confident stand ready. Perhaps this, after all, is the truest mark of civilisation: to be fluent on every subject but our own.

If you know someone who’d appreciate this, they probably will. Please share. Sharing's nice.
...
If you enjoyed this article and would like to see more, 'Buy the Goose a Coffee →'.
...
The views expressed are those of the correspondent. Factual claims draw on publicly available sources.