What the Strong Do.

Xi Jinping opened his meeting with Donald Trump last week with a reference to Thucydides, which is the diplomatic equivalent of quoting Seneca at a used-car dealership. Elegant, historically resonant, and almost certainly wasted on at least half the room.

Whether Trump himself grasped the allusion before someone explained it is one of those questions history will decline to answer with any precision. What we do know is that he subsequently told his social media audience that Xi had "very elegantly" suggested America might be in decline. Thucydides, who spent twenty-seven years watching clever men misread each other's intentions with catastrophic results, would have found this a perfectly recognisable beginning.

The "Thucydides Trap", for those who have better things to do than follow Harvard political science, describes the tendency of rising and established powers to stumble into conflict not through malice but through fear, pride, and the mutual inability to believe the other side might also have a point. Xi was invoking it as a warning, or at least as the diplomatic performance of a warning, which in great-power relations amounts to roughly the same thing.

Marco Rubio understood the reference. Several others at the table probably did. Whether any of them found the underlying message interesting is a different question entirely. The Trump administration's instinct, entirely consistent and not without a certain brutal logic, was to receive it as a status insult: Xi suggesting America was the anxious power, the declining hegemon, the one that needed to manage its fears. The structural warning, the bit about how both sides lose, appears to have registered somewhere below the tariff discussions.

This is where Thucydides becomes uncomfortably useful.

He was not writing a guide to wiser diplomacy. He was writing an account of what states actually do once power becomes available to them, and his conclusions were not optimistic. Governments speak about stability, order, and civilised restraint. Underneath runs the ordinary machinery of advantage, leverage, and fear. The language changes. The machinery does not.

His most quoted line comes from the Melian Dialogue, the passage in which Athens explains its position to the small island of Melos with a clarity that is almost refreshing in its honesty:

"The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."

It was not intended as a boast. It was intended as a description. The Athenians were telling the Melians that moral argument, in the absence of comparable power, is simply noise. The Melians appealed to justice. Athens appealed to reality. Melos was subsequently destroyed.

The reason the line has survived two and a half thousand years is not that it describes an ancient aberration. It is that every generation recognises it as a description of the present.

Look around. The strong doing what they can is no longer the Athenian exception. It is the simultaneous operating assumption of every significant power on the planet. Washington restructures the global trading order to suit itself and calls it fairness. Beijing expands across the South China Sea and calls it historical continuity. Russia obliterates a neighbouring country and calls it defensive necessity. Smaller nations recalibrate quietly, because they have read the Melian Dialogue even if they have not read Thucydides, and they understand which role is available to them.

The Sermon on the Mount promised that the meek would inherit the earth. It has not, on current evidence, aged as well as the Melian Dialogue. The room in Beijing was full of powerful men from two powerful countries, and the question of what the meek might inherit did not appear to be on the agenda. It rarely is, at that level of catering.

What makes Xi's invocation quietly interesting is that it was never really a warning. Warnings imply the possibility of a different outcome. This was something closer to a framing: China as the rising power mature enough to cite Greek tragedy, America as the established power invited to reflect on its anxieties. The classical reference was not the message. The classical reference was the signal that Beijing considers itself the civilisation in the room now, the one that thinks in centuries, that has absorbed Athens and Rome and the British Empire and found them all instructive and all, in the end, temporary.

Trump heard "decline." He was not entirely wrong. He simply missed that the point was being made about both of them.

Thucydides ends badly. Athens loses. Sparta wins and then also loses. This is not an accident. It is the point.

Neither side in Beijing appeared to be reading that far ahead. The strong rarely do. They are generally too busy doing what they can.

If you know someone who’d appreciate this, they probably will. Please share. Sharing's nice.
...
If you enjoyed this article and would like to see more, 'Buy the Goose a Coffee →'.
...
The views expressed are those of the correspondent. Factual claims draw on publicly available sources.